Recently, someone gave me the challenge to write about the “information community” I belong to. I could be as creative as I wanted, so I wrote a short story about the “author information community.” Enjoy.
“Wow, that was a great movie, wasn’t it, Elizabeth?” My friend turned to me and smiled.
“Yeah, it was okay,” I said, shrugging. “The story was a bit predictable, but other than that, it was fine.”
My friend tilted her head in confusion. “Predictable? Elizabeth, there were so many twists and turns, how can you call it predictable? I was on the edge of my seat the entire time!”
“Well, the screenwriters definitely did their jobs right, if you liked it. It’s just… for me, I figured out who the murderer was in the first ten minutes.”
“How?”
“I’m an author,” I said simply.
“That’s not an answer and you know it!”
I sighed. “All right. Authors, especially good authors, are trained to recognize the core concepts of stories: plot, character, setting, and of course, conflict. To have an effective story, everything you write must serve the story. You don’t want scenes or characters to go nowhere.”
“But you’re a fantasy author,” my friend said. “You wrote Silver Rose and Silver Crescent. We were watching a mystery.”
“It doesn’t matter. An author’s an author. I can spot the core concepts of a story a mile away. Your plot has to be engaging enough to draw the audience in. Your characters need to be complex and interesting and there needs to be room for them to grow. I don’t focus on setting as much as I probably should, but if done right, it can take on a life of its own and can almost be a character itself.”
“What about conflict?” my friend said. “When people talk about stories, they usually only mention plot, character, and setting.”
I smiled. “Conflict, in my opinion, is what makes or breaks a story. You could have the best plot ever, characters who leap off the page, and a rich and detailed setting, but it’s all for nothing if there is no conflict. If there’s no conflict, why is there even a story in the first place?”
“You’ve lost me there, Elizabeth.”
“Let me give you my favorite example. Mary walked to the store, bought some milk, and walked back home. That’s the story. It had a plot, a character, and a setting. Now, was it in any way interesting?”
“Not really.”
“That’s right. It was boring. Now, let’s try this. Mary walked to the store, bought some milk, and started to walk back home, when she was abducted by aliens.”
My friend leaned forward, engrossed. “Really? What happened?”
“You see?” I said triumphantly. “That’s my point. You weren’t interested until I added some conflict. Let’s say that the aliens were going to take Mary back to their home planet, but she escaped when she discovered that their weakness was milk. She splashed it on them, distracting them long enough to get away.”
My friend shook her head. “I don’t know how you come up with this stuff, Elizabeth.”
“Story ideas are always running through my head.”
“What about the mystery we were watching? How did you figure out the murderer’s identity so quickly?”
“Well, the countess was murdered in her country mansion, right?”
My friend nodded. “Yes, but there were three suspects: the nephew, the cook, and the gardener.”
“If you look at the foreshadowing, you can figure it out.”
“Umm…”
“All three had motive. The nephew thought he would be disinherited. The cook wanted revenge because the countess swindled her father out of his fortune. Neither one did it.”
“That’s why the gardener doing it was such a good twist!” my friend argued. “It took so long to reveal his motive that I discounted him as the murderer.”
“Ah, but the foreshadowing led me straight to him.”
“How?”
“The gardener’s motive was that he was the countess’s long lost son. He wanted revenge for her abandoning him.”
“But we didn’t even know she had a son until the end.”
“Again, the foreshadowing. Weren’t you curious as to why everyone kept saying that the countess had no children? As far as the audience knew, she wasn’t even married. So, why keep bringing it up? Authors only do this when they want to highlight important plot points. If there wasn’t a long lost child somewhere in the story, then the detail of her having no children is pointless.”
“So,” my friend said slowly, “the author only mentions details when it’s important?”
“Exactly. The countess’s son killing her out of revenge is the conflict, but we want the details, the clues, to prove it. Good authors strive to do just that. Especially in a mystery, which are so reliant on clues, the author needs to sprinkle these details in. They hint at the bigger story going on in the background.”
“Do all authors think like this?”
“It’s hard not to, when you spend so much of your time writing. You become adapt at noticing story details.”
“What about if you’re not an author?”
“Anyone can do it. Authors have an advantage, but anyone who is good at observing minute, almost undetectable details can do it. Now, come on. I’ll choose the next movie. Let’s see if you can think like an author.”
